<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux visitor numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willj.net/blog/2007/11/02/linux-visitor-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willj.net/blog/2007/11/02/linux-visitor-numbers/</link>
	<description>will.thoughts.pop</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://willj.net/blog/2007/11/02/linux-visitor-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-26655</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willj.net/blog/2007/11/02/278/#comment-26655</guid>
		<description>Ashley has revised his figures, the Linux-using visitors now number between 36,000 and 97,600.  That range seems an odd one to give, 60-odd thousand apart, but accurate to (presumably) the nearest hundred.

See http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2007/11/linux_figures_1.html for more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley has revised his figures, the Linux-using visitors now number between 36,000 and 97,600.  That range seems an odd one to give, 60-odd thousand apart, but accurate to (presumably) the nearest hundred.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2007/11/linux_figures_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2007/11/linux_figures_1.html</a> for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
